So You Failed Your Exam.
Right now it feels like the world has ended. It hasn't. But it absolutely does feel that way — and that's okay. Let's talk about what to do next.
A personal message from Dr Ramesh Mehay
This page was written for you. Please read it slowly — don't rush through it in one sitting. Come back to it across the next seven days. Let the ideas settle. And please, do not open a single revision book until you have read this page fully. That is the first and most important instruction.
Take a breath. Slow down. You are in exactly the right place.
— Dr Ramesh Mehay, Training Programme Director, Bradford VTS
📥 Downloads
Handouts, summaries, and teaching extras — ready when you are. Even at 2am after getting your results.
path: EXAM FAILURE
🌐 Web Resources
A hand-picked mix of BVTS guides, official resources, and honest real-world advice. Because sometimes the best pearls are not hiding in official documents — they're hiding in the lived experience of people who've been exactly where you are now.
⚡ If You Only Read One Thing
In a hurry? Reeling? Here are the ten things you most need to know right now.
📌 One-Minute Summary
📖 A Story You Might Recognise
This is a story about failing — and then figuring out why.
✍️ Written by a trainee, adapted from a real experience
I took my AKT and I failed. And then I took it again. And I failed again — my second score was even worse than my first. I sat there, staring at the screen, and I genuinely thought: maybe I'm just not as smart as everyone else on this scheme.
One evening, a colleague who had sailed through with brilliant scores and I got talking about the exams. "They're tough, aren't they?" I said — fully expecting them to agree, so I'd feel better about myself.
They did agree the exams were challenging. But then they told me about their study system. They had a plan. They studied for fixed blocks of time. They targeted their weak areas deliberately. They practised questions under exam conditions. They stopped at a sensible hour and went to bed.
I had been studying haphazardly — cramming random chapters, staying up all night before the exam, covering the same comfortable topics repeatedly. My failing to plan was planning to fail me.
The truth hit me: what got me through medical school was not going to get me through the MRCGP. I needed a completely different approach. Not harder — smarter.
When I redesigned my study plan — focusing on weak areas, using spaced repetition, stopping at midnight — everything changed. In the next attempt, I could feel the difference from the first question. I passed.
And yes, with hindsight, I'm grateful for those failures. I wouldn't have discovered a better way to learn without them. That learning has served me well ever since — in clinical practice, in teaching, in everything.
Studies show that many outstanding medical teachers and GPs took a non-linear path. Some failed undergraduate exams. Some came to medicine after a degree in an unrelated field. Some took longer to qualify. The journey is not the measure of the destination. A great GP is not defined by how fast they passed — but by the compassion, curiosity, and care they bring to every patient.
🌟 The Company You Keep
You are not alone in failing. You are in extraordinary company. Let that sink in for a moment.
Harry Potter was rejected by 12 different publishers before one finally said yes — reluctantly, and with a warning that she would never make money from children's books.
→ Became the best-selling book series in history
Did not speak fluently until age 4. Failed the entrance exam to the Swiss Federal Polytechnic. His teachers described him as "mentally slow."
→ Developed the theory of relativity; Nobel Prize in Physics
Fired from a newspaper for "lacking imagination and having no original ideas." His first animation studio went bankrupt.
→ Built the world's most beloved entertainment empire
Cut from his high school basketball team. Went home, shut himself in his room and cried. His coach thought he simply wasn't good enough.
→ Considered the greatest basketball player of all time
Fired from her first television job as a news anchor. Told she was "unfit for TV news" and "too emotionally invested in her stories."
→ Became the world's most powerful media personality
Fired from Apple — the very company he had founded. At 30, he was publicly ousted by the board he had helped build.
→ Returned to save Apple; transformed technology, music, and communication
Rejected by Decca Records in 1962. The label told their manager: "Guitar groups are on the way out. The Beatles have no future in show business."
→ Became the best-selling music act in history
His now-famous fried chicken recipe was rejected over 1,000 times by restaurants before one owner said yes. He started KFC at age 62.
→ Built a global fast-food empire with 25,000 outlets worldwide
Teachers told him he was "too stupid to learn anything." He had over 10,000 failed attempts before successfully inventing the lightbulb.
→ Held 1,093 patents; transformed daily life for all of humanity
Sold only one painting in his entire lifetime. Lived in poverty and was considered an eccentric failure by almost everyone he knew.
→ Now one of the most celebrated artists in human history
Failed in business twice, suffered a nervous breakdown, and lost eight elections before the age of 51. By almost any measure, a string of failures.
→ Became the 16th President; abolished slavery in America
Dyslexic. Left school at 16 with no formal qualifications. His headteacher told him he would "either end up in prison or become a millionaire."
→ Built the Virgin empire; one of Britain's most iconic entrepreneurs
Failure is not the opposite of success. It is part of the path to it. Every single person above had a moment where they could have stopped. They didn't.
The Non-Linear Path — Often the Most Interesting One
Over sixteen years as a Training Programme Director, some of the finest GPs I have met took roads that looked, on paper, like detours. A degree in agriculture first. Years as a nurse before medicine. A biomedical science degree, then a career change. On paper, unconventional. In practice, extraordinary. Their broader life experience made them better clinicians — more empathic, more grounded, more real with their patients.
Came to medicine later. Brought patience, perspective, and a completely different way of thinking about systems. Now an outstanding GP.
Knew patient care from the inside. Brought empathy that textbooks cannot teach. The patients adored them from day one.
Brought rigorous critical thinking. Asked the best questions. Became an exceptional educator and researcher in primary care.
A great doctor is not defined by how smoothly they got here. They are defined by the compassion, curiosity, and care they bring to every single patient. A failed exam does not subtract one gram of that. You decide what comes next.
📊 You Are Not Alone — The Numbers
It might feel like everyone else sailed through and you're the only one who failed. You are not.
Failing the AKT once is statistically normal — it happens to roughly one in three trainees. This does not mean you cannot pass. It means you haven't found the right approach yet. That is fixable.
🆘 Emotional First Aid — What To Do Right Now
Before you open a single book, before you look at another question, before you do anything else — do these things first. This is not optional fluff. It is neuroscience.
Do not hit the books straight away. This is the most common mistake trainees make. Your brain is in a state of stress — its capacity for new learning is temporarily reduced. Pushing through immediately is like trying to pour water into an already-full cup.
Take at Least 3 Days Off
No books. No questions. No revision apps. Just rest. Think of your brain like a muscle that's just been pushed very hard — it needs recovery time before it can build back stronger. Sleep is when your brain actually consolidates what it has already learned. More sleep = better memory. This is not laziness. It is science.
Vent How You Feel — To Someone Safe
Talk to a friend, a partner, a colleague, your trainer. Not to a study group about the exam — just to someone who will listen. Bottling up these feelings is like keeping a pressure cooker on the heat with the valve shut. It will find a way out eventually, and not in a way you'd choose. Research in educational psychology consistently shows that processing negative emotions verbally speeds recovery significantly.
- A close colleague — a fellow GP trainee who gets it
- Your partner or a trusted friend
- Your Trainer or one of the other GPs in the practice
- Your Educational Supervisor
- Your Training Programme Director (TPD)
🗣 Your Inner Dialogue Matters
After failing, most people become their own harshest critic. The voice inside the head goes into overdrive. Noticing what it is saying — and deciding whether to agree with it — is one of the most important things you can do right now.
- "I am so stupid."
- "I'll never pass this."
- "What is wrong with me?"
- "I'm a terrible doctor."
- "Everyone else managed it."
This voice is cruel. It adds pain without adding any useful direction.
- "I failed. That is disappointing."
- "What I did didn't work. That's information."
- "I need a different approach."
- "This is hard, but it is not impossible."
- "I can feel down and still move forward."
This voice is kind, honest, and productive. It tells the truth without cruelty.
If someone you deeply loved — a close friend, a partner, a sibling — spoke to themselves the way you are speaking to yourself right now, what would you say to them? Would you call them stupid? Would you tell them they will never succeed? Of course not. You would be kind, patient, and honest. You deserve exactly the same treatment from yourself.
Think about what you do when a patient is distressed. You invite them to talk. You listen. You sit with their lament. You know, as a clinician, that talking is therapeutic — that putting feelings into words moves them from inside the body to outside it, where they become a little smaller and a little more manageable. You are not exempt from that. Lamenting is healing. Let yourself lament.
Remember — You Are Still a Doctor
Your patients still value you. Your colleagues still respect you. An exam result does not reach into your clinic room and change the care you give. It is one measure, of one aspect, taken on one day. You are far more than a number on a results slip.
Contact Your TPD or Educational Supervisor
You do not have to navigate this alone. Your TPD and Educational Supervisor are there to help — not to judge. Tell them what happened. Ask for a meeting. They have seen this many times before and they know exactly what support is available. In fact, being proactive and reaching out shows maturity and self-awareness — qualities that examiners value.
Reviewing your feedback report with you • arranging additional study support • considering an extension to training if needed • signposting to specialist learning support (e.g. for dyslexia) • advising on resit timing
Come Back When You Feel Ready
Only return to study when you feel ready — not when you feel you should. There is a difference. The right mental state for productive learning is one of calm determination, not panicked urgency. You need to feel: "I can do this. I know it's possible. I'm going to approach it differently." That readiness is worth more than three extra days of anxious cramming.
🧠 The CBT Reframe — Change How You Think About This
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) teaches us that it's not the event itself that causes suffering — it's the meaning we attach to it. Research has consistently shown that CBT-based approaches significantly improve resilience after setbacks. Here's how to apply them right now.
A systematic review and meta-analysis published in 2024 found strong evidence that CBT effectively promotes resilience after adversity (standardised mean difference 0.73, p=0.007) and that these gains are maintained over time. CBT changes the way we interpret what happens to us — and that interpretation is what drives our feelings and behaviour (Beck, 2021). In other words: you can't change the result, but you can change what you do with it.
The Thought Record: From Catastrophe to Clarity
In CBT, we learn to catch automatic negative thoughts, question them, and replace them with more balanced ones. Here is how this works in practice for exam failure.
Common Cognitive Distortions After Exam Failure
CBT identifies specific thinking patterns that make setbacks worse. See if you recognise yourself here.
This is the most common distortion after exam failure. Life is not binary. A failed exam attempt does not mean a failed career. You are not a pass or a fail — you are a whole person with skills, compassion, and clinical knowledge that already helps patients. Think of it like a dimmer switch, not a light switch. You are not suddenly in the dark.
Catastrophising means jumping to the worst possible outcome and treating it as if it's already happened. Ask yourself: what is the most realistic outcome? Not the worst — the most realistic. Most trainees who fail and then change their approach do pass. What is the evidence for "never"? There usually isn't any. Replace "my career is over" with "I have a challenge to overcome".
This is when you take a specific result and turn it into a statement about who you are as a person. But you are not your exam score. The exam is measuring a specific set of knowledge and skills on a specific day. It is not measuring your worth, your compassion, your clinical insight, or your ability to connect with patients. Those things are not on the mark sheet — but they are real, and they matter.
We assume we know what others are thinking — and we assume the worst. In reality, your colleagues are mostly thinking about their own challenges. Your trainer is thinking about how to help you. Your patients don't know about the exam and still trust you with their health. Nobody is walking around thinking "there goes the person who failed". That thought lives only in your own head.
🌱 The Growth Mindset — What Dweck's Research Tells Us
Stanford psychologist Carol Dweck spent decades studying how people respond to failure. She found that people hold one of two fundamental beliefs about their abilities:
"Intelligence is fixed. I either have what it takes or I don't. Failure means I don't have it." — This mindset leads to avoidance, shame, and giving up.
"Ability develops through effort and strategy. Failure is feedback about what I need to change." — This mindset leads to resilience, learning, and eventual success.
Dweck's research showed that students with a growth mindset consistently outperform those with a fixed mindset — not because they're smarter, but because they respond differently to difficulty. The good news? You can deliberately choose a growth mindset. It is a skill, not a personality trait.
Imagine you're trying to swim across a lake but you keep sinking. You could conclude: "I'm not a swimmer — I should give up." Or you could think: "I'm using the wrong technique. Let me find out what good technique actually looks like." The ability to swim is not fixed from birth. Neither is the ability to pass an exam. Both require the right method, repeated with deliberate practice. The water hasn't changed. You just need a different stroke.
🪜 The Positive Steps — Your Recovery Framework
These steps work. But only if you actually do them — not just read and nod at them. Research in educational psychology consistently shows that structured, planned recovery outperforms unplanned reactive cramming. Every time.
This isn't just a comforting slogan. It's a cognitive reframe that changes your orientation from shame (which paralyses) to learning (which activates). Every attempt, however it ends, gives you information. The question is: what will you do with that information?
Your feedback report is a goldmine. Most people glance at it and feel devastated. What you should actually do:
- Get the feedback report in writing — do not rely on memory alone
- Note your scores in each domain separately, not just overall
- Identify your weakest domains — these are your highest-priority targets
- Compare your scores across attempts (if applicable) — is there a pattern?
- Note which types of question tripped you up — clinical, evidence-based medicine, administration?
- Bring this analysis to your Educational Supervisor — don't come empty-handed
The AKT has three domains: Clinical Medicine (~80%), Evidence-Based Medicine (~10%), and Organisational/Administrative (~10%). Many trainees score well in clinical but lose marks badly in EBM and admin — which represents an easy 20% to improve.
A good study plan is not a timetable — it is a strategy. Here is what makes the difference.
| Ineffective Study Habits | Evidence-Based Study Habits |
|---|---|
| Reading chapter after chapter passively | Active recall — close the book and test yourself after each section |
| Re-reading familiar material (feels productive, isn't) | Deliberate practice on weak areas — uncomfortable but effective |
| Long, exhausting sessions into the night | Focused 45–90 minute sessions with breaks (Pomodoro technique) |
| Cramming the night before | Spaced repetition over weeks (the brain consolidates during sleep) |
| Covering what you already know | Identify gaps first, then fill them deliberately |
| Doing questions without reviewing wrong answers | Time spent on explanations of wrong answers = maximum ROI |
Here is something that surprises most trainees: the best preparation for both the AKT and SCA is not sitting at a desk reading books. It is seeing patients. Real patients. In real surgeries. With real problems. Because both exams are built almost entirely around what walks through the surgery door every single day.
Passively reading textbooks and highlighting passages is one of the least effective learning strategies in existence. Yes, we all do it. Yes, it feels productive. But the material only reaches short-term working memory — it rarely transfers to long-term memory, where you actually need it on exam day. If you cannot recall something without looking at your highlighted notes, you have not learned it — you have only seen it.
🔄 What to Do Instead: The Contextual Learning Loop
Learning anchored to a real patient gets embedded in memory far more deeply than learning anchored to a textbook page. This is because the brain attaches emotional context, clinical detail, and narrative to the knowledge — making it far easier to retrieve.
🎯 Random Case Analysis (RCA) — Ask Your Trainer About This
Ask your trainer to do Random Case Analyses with you. In an RCA, your trainer picks a recent case from your clinical session and questions you about it — the diagnosis, the management, the guidelines, what you'd do differently. This technique:
- Forces you to think and reason out loud, not just recall facts passively
- Identifies specific gaps in your thinking — the ones you don't even know you have
- Anchors learning to a real clinical story — making it stick far longer than a textbook passage
- Directly mirrors the kind of applied reasoning the AKT and SCA test
- Is one of the most evidence-supported educational tools in GP training
Switching from highlighting textbooks (comfortable, familiar, feels productive) to contextual learning and active recall (challenging, slightly uncomfortable, genuinely effective) takes courage. But the research is clear: the slower, deeper methods work better. You hang onto the knowledge longer and more reliably. This is the approach that will actually change your result.
Sleep is not a luxury. It is when your brain physically consolidates what you have learned. The neuroscience here is unambiguous:
- During sleep, the hippocampus "replays" the day's learning and transfers it to long-term memory
- A single night of poor sleep reduces recall of recently learned material by up to 40%
- All-nighters do not work — they impair both retention and reasoning
- The most productive thing you can do the night before an exam is go to bed on time
No studying after 10pm. That hour of night-time revision is costing you far more than it gains. Your brain physically cannot encode new information well when it is tired. Stop. Sleep. Trust the process.
If you have failed the AKT multiple times despite genuine sustained effort, it may be worth considering whether an unrecognised learning difference such as dyslexia is a contributing factor. This is not a stigma — it is a clinical possibility that deserves investigation.
- Dyslexia and related conditions can affect reading speed, processing, and exam performance — independently of intelligence or clinical knowledge
- The RCGP offers reasonable adjustments under the Equality Act 2010 for candidates with recognised disabilities
- Assessment for dyslexia can be arranged through your Deanery or GP School
- Extra time in examinations is a common reasonable adjustment — and it can make a significant difference
Talk to your TPD or Educational Supervisor about your concerns. Ask about a formal assessment. This is confidential and does not reflect badly on you in any way.
📖 Study Smarter — Metacognition & SQ3R
Most people know that they need to study differently. Metacognition gives you the "how". It is simply "thinking about how you learn" — and it is one of the most powerful tools in education research.
Metacognition means understanding your own learning process. Instead of just reading and hoping it sticks, you deliberately think: How do I learn best? What are my weak areas? Am I actually retaining this or just feeling like I am? Studies consistently show that learners who use metacognitive strategies outperform those who don't — regardless of baseline intelligence. Think of it as being the coach and the athlete at the same time.
The SQ3R Method — How to Actually Learn from a Textbook
Most people don't know how to learn from a textbook — they can read one, but reading is not learning. SQ3R is a research-backed method that turns passive reading into active retention.
Closing the book and trying to recall what you've read feels uncomfortable. It feels like you don't know it. That uncomfortable feeling is not a sign of failure — it is precisely when learning happens. The discomfort is the brain working. Embrace it.
🔤 Memory Aid: RESTART
When you've failed and you don't know where to begin, remember RESTART.
📋 RCGP Regulations — What You Need to Know
Knowing the rules removes one source of anxiety. You are not in unknown territory — there are clear processes in place.
🔢 How Many Attempts Do I Have?
- Trainees entering GP specialty training from 2 August 2023 onwards: maximum 6 attempts at both AKT and SCA
- Trainees who entered before this date: the original 4-attempt limit applies, with an exceptional 5th attempt possible
- After 4 failed attempts: you may apply for an exceptional 5th attempt with deanery support
🆘 Support After Failure
- Your deanery and Educational Supervisor can arrange extended training
- Remedial placements in different practices may be offered
- Intensive exam preparation programmes may be approved by your GP School
- You have a right of appeal — to the deanery for WPBA, to the RCGP for AKT/SCA
In rare cases, failure of a very serious nature may raise concerns about fitness to practise. In this situation, your deanery will manage this under their misconduct procedures, and the GMC may be involved. This is rare and applies only where the examination findings suggest serious clinical concerns — not the normal experience of exam failure.
💬 Trainee Voices — What the Community Knows
The patterns below have been gathered from UK GP trainee communities, shared trainee accounts from across different deaneries, official deanery support resources, and direct trainee surveys. These are the things trainees who have been through this consistently say — the things that don't appear in any official guidance document.
These insights have been gathered from UK GP trainee online communities and forums, first-person trainee accounts, official deanery surveys, and RCGP resit support resources. All content aligns with official RCGP and GP educator guidance — these are patterns that have been cross-checked for accuracy before inclusion.
🔥 AKT — Patterns Trainees Report Again and Again
These themes appear repeatedly in trainee accounts. They represent the most consistent gap between what trainees thought would work and what actually turned the result around.
This is one of the most recurring patterns among trainees who fail after working in hospital medicine for several years before starting GP training. They bring their hospital thinking with them — and the AKT tests primary care thinking.
- Escalate to specialist for borderline results
- Investigate thoroughly before treating
- Patient always comes to you
- Guidelines you know = hospital-specialist guidelines
- Manage in primary care where possible; know the referral thresholds
- NICE CKS-guided first-line treatment from the first consultation
- Telephone, home visits, proxy consultations
- NICE, SIGN, BNF, DVLA, GMC, NHS admin frameworks
Consciously practise thinking like a GP in clinic every day, not just in revision. Ask yourself with every patient: "What would NICE CKS say here?" This habit accelerates exam readiness faster than any question bank.
This is arguably the single most common cause of AKT failure. Trainees complete entire question banks — sometimes multiple times — and see their scores improve gradually. They feel productive. But they are learning the questions, not the knowledge.
Going through 3,000 questions from a single question bank, noting your scores but not deeply reading the explanations for wrong answers. Repeating the same bank a second time. Scoring 80% on familiar questions and believing you're ready.
For every wrong answer, read the explanation fully — then go back to NICE CKS or BNF on that topic. Keep a running log of topics you consistently miss. Dedicate 60–70% of your revision to reading primary sources (NICE CKS) and use question banks to test whether that reading has stuck.
"I was under the impression that solving MCQs alone was sufficient to pass AKT. I should not have spent 90% of my time on one question bank and neglecting NICE CKS guidelines. I had never read so many NICE CKS guidelines as I did before passing."
Trainees who sit the AKT expecting it to be a clinical knowledge exam are consistently blindsided by the administration and evidence-based medicine domains. These together make up 20% of marks — and they are reliably neglected.
| Domain | % of AKT | Typical trainee score at failure | Typical trainee score after targeted prep |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical Medicine | 80% | 58–65% | 70–80% |
| Evidence-Based Medicine (Stats) | 10% | 55–65% | 80–95% |
| Organisational/Admin | 10% | 45–60% | 85–95% |
Trainees who fail narrowly almost always show a significant admin or stats deficit. And yet these two domains are the most teachable — the content is finite, predictable, and highly structured. A focused fortnight on stats and admin can add 15–20 marks.
DVLA fitness to drive rules • Sick note (fit note) regulations • Notification of infectious diseases • Advance decisions and LPA • Referral pathways and 2-week wait criteria • Controlled drugs regulations • NHS structures and commissioning • GMC duties of a doctor • Consent and capacity in adults and children
Timing the AKT well is one of the most important and most underrated decisions in exam preparation. Trainees who sit too early — before completing a GP placement — significantly increase their chance of failure.
- The AKT tests the application of knowledge in a primary care context — without clinical GP experience, this context is missing
- Many deaneries advise waiting until during or after your first GP placement before sitting
- Some trainees whose supervisors recommended delaying to ST3 found their first-time pass rate significantly improved
- There is no virtue in sitting early if it results in a failed attempt — the attempt is then "used up"
Discuss the timing with your Educational Supervisor. If you haven't done a GP placement yet, strongly consider waiting. The RCGP resit guidance specifically notes that timing is important and that not everyone's situation is the same — this is a personal decision that should be made with your trainer.
This theme comes up repeatedly in accounts from IMG trainees who have failed and then passed. The AKT is not testing generic medical knowledge — it is testing the application of UK-specific clinical and administrative frameworks.
- UK-specific NICE guidelines — not international equivalents, even if more familiar
- NHS administrative systems — referral pathways, 2-week-wait criteria, notification systems
- DVLA regulations — a frequent admin domain question that many IMGs have never encountered
- UK benefits and sick note (fit note) system — entirely different from most other countries
- Cultural context of UK GP consultations — patient expectations, NHS norms, consultation styles
"I wish I had known sooner that the exams require thinking like a British doctor, working with British guidelines, and serving a mostly British population. Differences in training approaches between IMG and British trainers also posed challenges."
Use the Bradford VTS IMGs section for UK-specific context • Read NICE CKS systematically rather than adapting guidelines from your home country • Discuss UK-specific admin topics explicitly with your trainer • Attend any deanery admin and statistics days available to you
Poor time management is one of the most commonly reported causes of AKT failure — and one that is entirely preventable with deliberate practice. The AKT has 160 questions in 160 minutes. That is exactly one minute per question — less once you allow for reviewing flagged questions.
- Many trainees spend 3–4 minutes on difficult questions early in the exam, then run out of time near the end
- It is better to mark a question and move on than to miss five questions at the end because one absorbed your focus
- Timed mock practice is the only way to calibrate your pace — aim for at least 30% of your revision under timed conditions
- The RCGP advises practising mock assessments specifically to understand time spent on different question types
Flag and move on if you've spent 90 seconds on a question without an answer. Come back to flagged questions at the end if time allows. Never leave questions blank — an educated guess scores better than nothing. Data interpretation and stats questions are time-hungry: practise these specifically under time pressure.
🎯 SCA — Patterns That Separate Those Who Pass from Those Who Don't
The SCA is not a knowledge exam. These patterns come from trainees who failed and then passed — and from UK GP educators reflecting on what they consistently see go wrong.
This pattern is consistently described in UK GP training communities: trainees form study groups, practise cases intensively together — and still fail. The problem is structural, not motivational.
- Peers share the same blind spots — errors pass unnoticed because no one recognises them
- Without expert feedback, you practice the same patterns repeatedly — including the wrong ones
- Group norms develop ("this is how we do it") that may diverge from what examiners actually assess
- Emotional safety in peer groups can reduce the challenge needed for growth
Continue peer practice — it is valuable for volume. But supplement it with feedback from your trainer or GP educator, ideally with video or audio recordings reviewed together. Your deanery may also offer SOX (Support on Exams) tutorials or 1-1 RCGP examiner sessions after multiple failures. These provide the expert feedback that peer groups cannot.
A striking theme in trainee accounts of successful resits is this: they went back to the RCGP website, re-read the SCA marking criteria, watched the official sample consultation videos, and treated this as foundational prep — not optional background reading.
- Read the RCGP SCA candidate handbook — understand exactly what each domain requires
- Watch the RCGP sample consultation videos and use them as benchmarks
- One trainee noted: "Initially I felt those sample videos were perfect examples but when I re-watched them after practising, I noticed some cases could have been done better — that's where I started to improve"
- The marking schedule is, in effect, the "answer sheet" — if you understand it deeply, you know exactly what to aim for in every consultation
The RCGP advises: "Don't fight your feedback. Your memories of a consultation include a self-assessment of how you think you performed. However, you were managing the interaction whilst the examiner was solely focussed on your performance and assessing it against fixed criteria."
This is one of the most consistent SCA failure patterns. Trainees spend so much time on data gathering and exploring the history that the consultation ends before reaching shared management. The examiner has assessed the first domain well — but the second and third domains score poorly or not at all.
⏱ Target Timeline for a 12-Minute SCA Consultation
RCGP guidance advises aiming to reach management by 6–7 minutes into the consultation. If you're still deeply in history-taking at 8 minutes, you need to move on. Practise this timing repeatedly until it feels natural — it is a skill, not a talent.
Another pattern that appears repeatedly: trainees with solid clinical knowledge who repeatedly underperform in the SCA because their consultation style is procedural, not relational. They are delivering information rather than conducting a partnership.
- Ticking off history-taking boxes
- Delivering a diagnosis without acknowledging the patient's reaction
- Offering a management plan without asking for the patient's view
- ICE as a checklist item, not a genuine inquiry
- Safety-netting as a formulaic closing statement
- Responding to what the patient actually says, not a script
- Noticing and naming emotion before moving to clinical content
- Sharing options and genuinely waiting for the patient's preference
- ICE that flows naturally from the conversation
- Safety-netting with specific, named symptoms to watch for
A recurring theme: trainees who talk at patients (even knowledgeably) consistently score lower than trainees who listen to patients — even with less polished clinical content. The SCA is primarily a test of whether you can consult as a newly qualified GP. A newly qualified GP is expected to be human first, technical second.
Exam anxiety in the SCA often manifests as hyper-vigilance around knowledge display — trainees try to show everything they know rather than simply consulting well. Examiners consistently describe this as one of the most recognisable failure patterns.
- Trainees who pass the SCA often describe forgetting they were being examined — being absorbed in the patient's story
- Trainees who fail often describe watching themselves from the outside, self-monitoring constantly
- The antidote is practice until the consultation skills become unconscious — automatic rather than deliberate
- Refocus your preparation goal from "how do I demonstrate competence?" to "how do I help this patient?"
Before each practice consultation, say to yourself: "I am here to help this patient. That is the only thing I need to remember." The clinical content, the frameworks, the phrases — all of that is background. The foreground is the person in front of you. When you genuinely care about helping them, the consultation tends to take care of itself.
🌱 Wellbeing & Practical Patterns — Things Nobody Puts in the Official Guidance
These are the personal, human things that trainees consistently mention — the factors that sit beneath the revision strategies.
💬 Direct Trainee Voices (Wessex Deanery AKT Survey, 2025)
"Took time to reflect on the first attempt, restructured strategies with guidance from my ST3 trainer, and reframed preparation."
"Anxiety and procrastination hindered consistent preparation. Recognising procrastination as a tool to manage anxiety would have helped."
"Discussions and collaborative efforts are essential. Studying alone is too boring — and it's also less effective."
"Used flowcharts extensively for almost everything — it became my way of learning rather than memorising."
Multiple trainee accounts describe having a goal outside the exam — running a marathon, family time, a hobby — as actively improving their exam performance by preventing burnout and preserving mental clarity. You are not a revision machine. You are a person who is revising.
Plan and book study leave as soon as you know your exam date. Don't try to squeeze revision around a full clinical schedule without protected time. Your deanery typically provides 5 study days for exam preparation — use them strategically, not as a last-minute block.
Trainees who resit too soon after a failure — especially if they failed clinical significantly — often fail again. The clinical domain takes months to rebuild properly. Give yourself enough time to actually change your preparation, not just repeat it slightly differently.
🎬 From UK GP Training Video Resources
These insights come from official UK GP training video content — including RCGP preparation materials and deanery-produced support resources. Only content consistent with official RCGP guidance is included here.
📹 AKT Video Insights (RCGP & Deanery Resources)
- Allow yourself to feel disappointed — you have to allow yourself to fail before you can move forward
- The AKT is a broad programme tested on specific details — recognising this gap changes how you revise
- Timing is a skill, not just a technique — 160 questions in 160 minutes requires deliberate pace practice
- Look at AKT feedback reports published by the RCGP after every sitting — they highlight recurring weak areas across cohorts
- Sit during a GP placement if at all possible — the applied context it provides is irreplaceable
- Don't study until you feel back in the right frame of mind — mental state affects learning quality
📹 SCA Video Insights (RCGP & Deanery Resources)
- Practise consulting within the 10-minute consultation window from early in your preparation — not just the week before
- Aim to reach management by 6–7 minutes — if you're still gathering data at 8 minutes, you are running late
- Video recording your real consultations and reviewing them with your trainer is one of the most powerful preparation tools available
- Feedback from an RCGP examiner or SOX educator is qualitatively different from peer feedback — seek it out
- Know your guidelines — SCA tests clinical knowledge within the consultation, not separately from it
- Joining different practice groups (not just the same people) exposes you to different consultation styles and feedback perspectives
Every trainee who turned a failure into a pass changed something fundamental — not just worked harder. Some changed their study method. Some changed the timing of their exam. Some changed who they practised with. Some changed their mindset about what the exam was actually testing. The question is not how much more you should do. It is what you should do differently.
💎 Insider Pearls — What Trainees Who've Been Here Wish They Knew
These are patterns gathered from trainees who failed and then passed. They are not found in any official document.
The most comfortable material to revise is the stuff you already know. And it feels productive. But revising what you already know does almost nothing for your score. You have to deliberately target the topics that make you feel uncomfortable. That discomfort is the point.
Reading a topic and feeling familiar with it is not the same as being able to apply it under pressure. The test: can you close the book and explain it out loud to someone? Can you answer a question on it without the text in front of you? That's the difference.
The SCA is not a knowledge test. It tests what you do with your knowledge inside a real consultation. Trainees who fail often know the clinical content well — but run through it like a checklist, missing the patient's emotion entirely.
This is extremely common, especially among trainees who have always been academically successful before. Asking for help is not weakness. It is the most effective thing you can do. The trainees who bounce back fastest are almost always those who reach out early.
When you see colleagues who passed looking calm and confident, you assume it all came easily to them. It usually didn't. You just didn't see their private panic. Social comparison after exam failure is reliably misleading — and reliably damaging.
Cutting sleep to study more is the most counterproductive thing you can do for exam performance. Research is unambiguous on this. Protect your sleep like you protect your patients — non-negotiably and consistently.
🧑🏫 For Trainers & TPDs — How to Help
When your trainee fails an exam, how you respond in the first 48 hours matters more than anything you'll do in the next month.
💜 The Immediate Response — What Helps and What Doesn't
| ❌ Avoid This | ✅ Do This Instead |
|---|---|
| "You'll be fine — just work harder next time" | "That must feel really disappointing. How are you doing?" |
| Immediately jumping to study plans and strategies | Create space for them to feel what they feel first — at least a few days |
| "I'm surprised — I thought you were doing well" | "Exam results don't always reflect clinical competence. Let's figure this out together." |
| Comparing them to previous trainees who failed | Focus on this individual's specific pattern and needs |
| Taking it personally as a reflection of your teaching | Separate your feelings from theirs — they need you to be steady |
Sit down with the feedback report together — ideally at a tutorial 1–2 weeks after the result (not on the day). Go domain by domain. Ask: "Looking at these scores, which areas do you think we should focus on first?" This is their analysis, not yours — guide it rather than lead it.
- Review each domain score and identify priority areas together
- Ask the trainee to reflect on their study method — not just their knowledge gaps
- Check whether the trainee is using spaced repetition and active recall
- Consider arranging a referral for learning needs assessment if there are repeated unexplained failures
- Set a realistic date for the resit — not too soon, not so far off that momentum is lost
These questions help trainees develop metacognitive insight — the ability to understand how they learn.
- "If you could go back and change one thing about your preparation, what would it be?"
- "When you were studying, how did you know whether something had actually stuck?"
- "Which topics felt comfortable to revise — and might that have caused you to avoid the harder ones?"
- "On exam day, were there any questions you knew but got wrong? What happened there?"
- "What would passing feel like, and what would need to be different for that to happen?"
When a trainee fails, trainers can feel a mix of emotions — concern, frustration, guilt, perhaps self-doubt. These are all understandable. But they belong in supervision, not in the room with the trainee.
A trainee who fails does not automatically mean you have failed as a trainer. Sometimes great trainers have trainees who fail. And sometimes a trainee failing is the very thing that catalyses their most profound growth — with the right support. The most important thing you can do is stay present, stay steady, and help them find their way forward.
❓ FAQ — Quick Answers to the Questions You're Probably Asking
Yes. Absolutely. Exam failure, even repeated exam failure, does not automatically end your career. The RCGP and deaneries have processes to support trainees, including extended training, remedial placements, and additional attempts. Thousands of excellent GPs in practice today failed an exam at some point in their training.
Not necessarily. The most important thing is choosing a date when you will be genuinely ready — not the soonest possible date. Resitting too quickly without changing your approach simply repeats the same outcome. Take the time to redesign your plan properly. Discuss the timing with your Educational Supervisor.
Your training record is managed through your deanery, not directly by your employer. Your Educational Supervisor and TPD will be aware. If there are concerns about your fitness to practise as a result (rare), formal processes will be followed. If you're unsure about any employment implications, your medical defence organisation (MDU, MPS, or MDDUS) can give confidential advice.
After a fourth failure, you may apply to the RCGP for an exceptional fifth attempt — with the support of your Head of GP School or GP Deanery Director. This requires evidence that additional educational experience has been undertaken, or that such experience is planned. Speak to your TPD immediately. Do not try to navigate this alone.
It is also worth noting that trainees who entered training from August 2023 onwards may have up to six attempts. Check your specific cohort rules with your deanery.
You do have a right of appeal — to the deanery for WPBA and to the RCGP for AKT or SCA. However, it is important to be realistic: standard-setting processes for the AKT and SCA are rigorous and regularly audited. While appeals are legitimate, "the exam was unfair" without specific evidence is unlikely to succeed. If you have a genuine concern about specific circumstances that affected your performance (illness on the day, a technical issue), an appeal may be appropriate. Seek advice from your deanery.
Yes — and it is important to understand why. The AKT and SCA test not just clinical knowledge but also familiarity with UK-specific systems, NHS structures, and the cultural patterns of UK GP consultations. These are things UK-trained doctors absorbed gradually throughout their undergraduate training — and IMGs have to learn them more deliberately. This is not a reflection of your intelligence or clinical ability. It is a knowledge gap that is absolutely addressable with focused preparation. The Bradford VTS IMGs section has specific advice for this.
🔥 AKT — Why People Fail and How to Turn It Around
The AKT is 160 questions over 160 minutes across three domains. Understanding which domain is costing you marks is the first and most important step in your recovery plan.
📊 AKT Structure (160 questions, 160 minutes)
- Clinical Medicine: ~128 questions (80%)
- Critical Appraisal & Evidence-Based Practice: ~16 questions (10%)
- Organisational & Regulatory: ~16 questions (10%)
Most failing trainees score well in clinical but poorly in EBM and admin. Focused effort on these two smaller domains can raise your overall score significantly — and they are more predictable to revise.
🚫 Common AKT Failure Patterns
- Over-relying on question banks without reviewing wrong answer explanations
- Ignoring EBM and admin domains (the "easy wins")
- Using outdated revision materials — guidelines change
- Not practising under timed conditions
- Revising familiar comfortable topics instead of tackling gaps
- Possible unrecognised dyslexia affecting reading speed
Question banks are valuable — but only if you use them correctly. Doing thousands of questions and noting your score is largely wasted time if you don't review wrong answers properly.
- For every wrong answer, read the full explanation — not just the correct option
- Keep a "wrong answers log" — a running note of topics you consistently get wrong
- Use the log to guide your reading — go back to the source material for those topics
- Do timed sessions at least 30% of the time — the time pressure matters
- Do not cherry-pick easy topics — deliberately target your weak areas
Revise with the RCGP curriculum as your framework, not a textbook list. The curriculum tells you exactly what a future GP is expected to know.
- RCGP curriculum 2025 — read every domain heading and use it as a checklist
- NICE CKS — use for first-line and second-line management across common conditions
- BNF — for prescribing specifics, contraindications, and drug interactions
- SIGN guidelines for areas NICE doesn't cover
- Statistics basics — NNT, NNH, sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios (EBM domain)
- GMC Good Medical Practice — ethics, consent, confidentiality (admin domain)
- NHS England operational policies — referral thresholds, sick note rules, CQC (admin domain)
🗣 SCA Phrases That Actually Get Marks
The SCA assesses three domains: Data Gathering, Clinical Management & Complexity, and Relating to Others. Here are practical phrases for each one — all tested in real consultations, none of them robotic.
Scripts and memorised phrases can feel artificial if you use them verbatim. Read these once, understand the intention behind each one, and let your own words carry that intention. A phrase is a starting point, not a script. The most important thing is that it sounds like you — calm, curious, and genuine.
This domain assesses your ability to gather information efficiently and accurately — through questions, examination, and interpretation of available data. Examiners want to see that you ask the right questions, not every possible question.
Opening & Inviting the Story
Drilling Down Systematically
Checking Red Flags Without Alarming
ICE — Ideas, Concerns, Expectations
Prioritised, targeted questioning • Clear exploration of ICE • Appropriate use of clinical history-taking frameworks • Recognition of relevant context (e.g. occupational, social) • Efficient — not a spray-and-pray approach
This domain assesses whether you can synthesise information, handle co-morbidities, demonstrate clinical reasoning, and involve the patient in genuine shared decision-making.
Explaining Your Thinking
Shared Decision-Making
Handling Complexity & Co-morbidities
Safety-Netting
Evidence-based management • Recognition of complexity/comorbidity • Genuine shared decision-making (not just informing) • Appropriate investigations • Explicit and specific safety-netting (not vague "come back if worried") • Referral when appropriate
This domain assesses your communication, empathy, rapport-building, and professionalism. Many trainees think this is about being "nice". It isn't — it's about being genuinely human under pressure. Examiners can tell when empathy is scripted.
Showing Genuine Empathy
When the Patient Is Upset or Tearful
When the Patient Is Frustrated or Angry
When the Patient Wants Something You Can't Provide
Closing the Consultation with Confidence
Genuine rapport (not performed empathy) • Active listening — noticing what the patient didn't say • Appropriate verbal and non-verbal responses • Handling difficult moments without losing control of the consultation • Partnership language ("we", "together") rather than instructional language ("you should", "you must")
- Rushing past ICE because you're trying to cover clinical content faster
- Safety-netting vaguely — "come back if you're worried" without specifying what to watch for
- Explaining a diagnosis before acknowledging the patient's emotion
- Offering options without genuinely exploring the patient's preference
- Over-relying on memorised phrases that sound rehearsed rather than human
- Forgetting to close the agenda — "Is there anything else on your mind today?"
Videos
How to bounce back from failure
Study less, study smart (v. good)
three
four
five
I took my AKT test and I failed! The grade I got was worse than my first exam! What was I doing wrong? At this point, I began to surrender to the way that I simply wasn’t as savvy or clever as my kindred learners on the training scheme. In any case, it was unfair – I could go throughout the late evening studying and still come up short while my companions got high scores and never seemed to be revising much! But life’s not fair, right? Maybe I wasn’t as capable for acing my tests as were they. Perhaps I was simply predetermined never to arrive at similar levels of success that they could? Should I concentrate on being content with where I was and simply acknowledge that.
One night another trainee —somebody who passsed with really great scores — and I were hanging out and we talked about the exams. “They’re extreme, aren’t they?” I said. “No doubt! I truly needed to study hard for this one” she replied. Wait, what? I never saw her revising and getting stressed out! And here she was, revealing to me that she truly studied hard? What did she mean?
It turns out that she knew something I didn’t. What she knew going into the test was that she could study as hard as she could, but if she was not studying in a way that let her brain absorb the information effectively, then she might as well have not studied at all!
In contrast to her, I discovered that I had no study or learning plan and, as the saying goes, my failing to plan was planning to fail me. It was clear that I was studying haphazardly or aimlessly all the way up to the exam. In fact, I tried to cram a lot of last minute chapters the night before! Sadly, our minds don’t work that way do they. By remaining up throughout the night, I was simply wasting my time as opposed to really retaining the material.
What got me here wasn’t going to get me there; if I planned to carry on with the same study strategy as before. My study routine required a redesign.
I turned my performance around by figuring out how to study more efficiently – smarter, not harder. I made a study plan that made me focus on my weak areas. And when the exam came around, I quickly felt the difference. Never again was I frantically searching for questions that I knew the responses to. Rather, I responded to most questions effortlessly and with more certainty. And I could make good educated guesses on those things that I didn’t know. Later, I gomy results: I had nailed it.
The best trainees are not really talented, gifted or more fortunate than all of us. They basically realise how to study smarter as opposed to harder. Despite the fact that in my first and second attempts I had worked harder and routinely late throughout the nights compared to my colleague, her study methods permitted her to both master the knowledge more successfully and in less time.
Success in your exams is not reserved for those who are naturally gifted. Any learner can achieve it providing they use an efficient study strategy that is well paced and gives you a decent night’s rest before examination day. I know it is difficult to relinquish your old examination study techniques that may have served you well in the past – yet remember – your last test was a fall as a direct result of it and no doubt you felt you worked super hard and stressed. So, time to take a courageous move and get familiar with an alternate way – simpler, less pushed and will serve you for the rest of your life (and pass the AKT or CSA).
No, no and NO.
- Please don’t hit the books straight away.
- Take a break for at least 3 days first.
- Speak to others to vent how you feel.
- Don’t study until you feel you are back in the right frame of mind. You need to be at the point where you feel ready to start learning again. You also need to feel positively determined to pass at the next attempt and believe that it is do-able.
- And don’t go into denial. It’s the worst thing you can do – to blame the exam for being unfair or the college for testing “stupid” stuff. If you take the POSITIVE steps outlined below, there is a very significant chance you can be successful.
I blew the exam! Now what?
Remember, FAIL means Failed Attempt In Learning.